Calculation of Electron Stopping Power in Human Skin and Bone Cortical (100–260 MeV)

Authors

  • Dahlia K. Gatea Department of Physics, College of Science, University of Basrah, Basrah, Iraq Author
  • Fatima O. Nasser Babylon Education Directorate, Babylon, Iraq Author
  • Amer S ,Al-Khafagi Babylon Education Directorate, Babylon, Iraq Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64354/5kd1qd19

Keywords:

semi-empirical, Electron, Stopping Power, Human, Skin and Bone Cortical

Abstract

The aim of this study is to assess the mass stopping power for human skin and bone in the range of energies from 100 to 260 MeV with an emphasis on the relevance of reliable estimates of mass stopping power to very high-energy electron (VHEE) radiotherapy. Units mass electronic stopping power (MeV·cm²/g) versus electron energy (MeV). Theoretical calculations for collisional and radiative degradation, including the density-effect correction, were performed in MATLAB 2025, and results were compared with the data from NIST ESTAR database. An energy electrons and three-parameter semi-empirical expression (H = 2.4515, b = 1.0092, and G = 225) was also fitted to estimate the stopping power as a function of electron kinetic energy. Excel 2024 calculations yielded a high correlation coefficient (R = 1) for both skin and bone, with percentage errors of 3.46% for skin and the correlation coefficient between the semi-empirical equation and the practical ESTAR data is R = 0.975 with an error percentage of ( MAPE = 5.90%) for bone cortical using the semi-empirical fit [9]. In contrast, the theoretical Bethe–Bloch equations showed very weak correlations with semi-empirical equation data, with (MAPE = 93.55%) for skin and (MAPE = 98.15%) for bone. These discrepancies may be associated with the limitations of the theoretical model in accounting for energy-loss mechanisms such as bremsstrahlung and material polarization effects These differences emphasize the necessity of proper representation of the radiative loss and material-dependent density effects at high energies. The semi-empirical approach could give a convenient estimate within the energy range under investigation, but must be further validated and numerical implementation and the definition of the parameters carefully checked before clinical use.

References

1. ICRU Report 37 (1984). Stopping Powers for Electrons and Positrons. International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD.

2. Subiel, A., et al. (2014). Very high energy electrons (VHEE) for radiotherapy: High dose rate and spatial fractionation modalities. Physics in Medicine & Biology, 59(19), 5811–5829.

3. Berger, M. J., Coursey, J. S., Zucker, M. A., & Chang, J. (2005). ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR: Computer Programs for Calculating Stopping Powers and Ranges for Electrons, Protons, and Helium Ions. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Gaithersburg, MD.

4. Sternheimer, R. M., Seltzer, S. M., & Berger, M. J. (1982). The density effect for the ionisation loss of charged particles in various substances. Physical Review B, 26(11), 6067–6076.

5. Attix, F. H. (2008). Introduction to Radiological Physics and Radiation Dosimetry. John Wiley & Sons, New York.

6. Schüler, E., et al. (2017). Very High Energy Electron (VHEE) beam therapy: Physical characteristics and clinical applications. Medical Physics, 44(6), 2544–2555.

7. MathWorks Inc. (2025). MATLAB: The Language of Technical Computing, Release 2025a. Natick, Massachusetts, United States.

8. Seltzer, S. M., & Berger, M. J. (1985). Bremsstrahlung spectra in the energy range 0.75–20 MeV. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B, 12(1), 95–134.

9. Khan, F. M., & Gibbons, J. P. (2014). Khan's The Physics of Radiation Therapy. 5th ed., Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia.

10. Møller, C. (1932). Zur Theorie des Durchgangs schneller Elektronen durch Materie. Annalen der Physik, 406(5), 531–585.

11. ICRP Publication 23 (1975). Report of the Task Group on Reference Man. International Commission on Radiological Protection, Pergamon Press, Oxford.

12. Uehara, S., & Nikjoo, H. (2006). Monte Carlo simulation of electron track structure and energy deposition in biological target volumes. International Journal of Radiation Biology, 82(1), 27–39.

13. Koch, H. W., & Motz, J. W. (1959). Bremsstrahlung cross-section formulas and related data. Reviews of Modern Physics, 31(4), 920–955.

14. Heitler, W. (1954). The Quantum Theory of Radiation. 3rd ed., Oxford University Press, London.

15. Subiel, A., Moskvin, V., Welsh, G. H., Cipiccia, S., Reboredo, D., DesRosiers, C., & Jaroszynski, D. A. (2017). Challenges of dosimetry of ultra-short pulsed very high energy electron beams. Physica Medica, 42, 327–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2017.04.029.

16. Berger, M. J., Coursey, J. S., Zucker, M. A., & Chang, J. (2005). ESTAR, PSTAR, and ASTAR: Computer Programs for Calculating Stopping Powers and Ranges for Electrons, Protons, and Helium Ions. NIST, Gaithersburg, MD. https://doi.org/10.18434/T4NC7P.

17. Calculation of the electron stopping power of some components of human body tissues. (2023). Kuwait Journal of Science, 50(4), 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjs.2023.03.00.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-20

Issue

Section

Research Articles

How to Cite

Calculation of Electron Stopping Power in Human Skin and Bone Cortical (100–260 MeV). (2026). New Journal of Biology and Medicine, 2(3), 49-53. https://doi.org/10.64354/5kd1qd19

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.